I love to write, and I love to share my writing with folks I think will like it. And I usually ask them what they think of a particular piece, but here’s the rub: I don’t really, REALLY like to be criticized.
I just admitted this to myself.
A good writer has to be open to criticism, I think, particularly if they are asking for it, as I do. But it’s just so defeating to give someone a writing sample, and to get back from them, “Huh. I don’t get it. Maybe you should develop this a little more.” Or even worse: “Hmm. Where are you going with this? Do you even know?” I think I dislike this question, because the truth is, I probably don’t know where it’s going. I may not really know what it is I’m trying to say…I just want the reader to go, “Wow, I really like that character. She is real.”
When I recieve criticism, I’m thinking “Oh, you mean you wanted a plot? I don’t know if I can deliver. But look at this great line, and look how I described the tension in the room. Isn’t that good? Doesn’t that suffice?” Apparently not.
Recently, my writing group gave me some very good feedback regarding a short story I wrote. I knew (and know still) that it was great feedback, and that I was lucky to have it. But on some level, I felt utterly depressed afterward, because I realized that often my writing is for me alone and isn’t in any kind of shape to be shared. It took me a couple of weeks to look at the piece again, to think about the comments I’d received in regard to it, to decide which of the suggestions I’d take, which I’d discard. And it took me a while to understand that sometimes writing is good just for writing’s sake: the more you write, the better you write. Not every single sentence must be a candidate for the Pushcart Prize or some other literary award.
New Year’s Resolution #1: Stop taking it all so seriously.